gloss: woman in front of birch tree looking to the right (Sam - hassled by love)
Guy Pamplemousse ([personal profile] gloss) wrote in [community profile] dark_agenda2009-12-21 04:03 pm

question re: uploading

Since AO3 has such nifty tagging features, is anyone thinking of tagging their stories with "dark agenda"?

I think it would be a great way to sort and collate, but I am also very, very tired and possibly not seeing any downsides. Thoughts?
dharmavati: cute Asian girl is hugging the world ({misc} I love the whole world)

[personal profile] dharmavati 2009-12-21 09:11 pm (UTC)(link)
I like this idea!
plazmah: Abstract circle and square with "plazmah" underneath (glee: mercedes)

[personal profile] plazmah 2009-12-21 09:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Is there a tag already at AO3 that could fulfill the same purpose? I know "characters of colour" is already being used.

Or, you know, we could always do both. There's no such thing as Too Many Tags. ;)
plazmah: Abstract circle and square with "plazmah" underneath (glee: mercedes)

Re: urk, more thoughts, sorry

[personal profile] plazmah 2009-12-21 09:49 pm (UTC)(link)
I definitely see your point; after I made my comment, I was wrestling with the use of the CoC tag for my own submission, which is a non-Western fandom. I'm all for it then. :)
starlady: Kermit the Frog, at Yuletide (yuletide)

Re: urk, more thoughts, sorry

[personal profile] starlady 2009-12-21 09:49 pm (UTC)(link)
The limitation I see with using CoC is its applicability to non-Western fandoms, particularly animanga, where, yes, from a Western perspective a character is "of color", but as a member of one's own dominant group, it's a little different from tagging, say, a Sherman Alexie-fanfic.

I think that's a really good way of putting it.

Also, I don't think it's an either/or situation with the CoC tag--using both is certainly possible. ETA: When applicable.
Edited 2009-12-21 21:49 (UTC)
cesy: "Cesy" - An old-fashioned quill and ink (Default)

Re: urk, more thoughts, sorry

[personal profile] cesy 2009-12-24 06:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Using both (wherever applicable) sounds like a good idea to me.